
Key Takeaways:
- A new study comparing the ketogenic (keto) diet and the Mediterranean diet found that the keto diet provided greater short-term improvements in metabolic health, including better blood sugar control, gut microbiota diversity, body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference.
- The keto diet’s benefits diminished after six months, with both diets delivering comparable health outcomes by the end of the year-long study.
- While effective for weight loss, the keto diet comes with potential risks, such as nutrient deficiencies, liver strain, and kidney issues, due to its restrictive nature.
- Experts recommend the Mediterranean diet as a safer and more sustainable option for individuals with type 2 diabetes and other metabolic conditions.
A small-scale study conducted by researchers in Italy and Brazil provided new insights into the effects of two popular diets on individuals with type 2 diabetes. Published in the journal Metabolites, the year-long trial assessed the short- and long-term impacts of a ketogenic (keto) diet compared to a Mediterranean diet. Participants in the study showed notable differences in health metrics during the first six months, with the keto diet appearing to yield greater metabolic benefits initially. However, these advantages were not sustained throughout the trial, leading researchers to consider the Mediterranean diet’s broader potential as a long-term solution.
Understanding the Study’s Parameters
The study focused on 11 individuals aged 45 to 65 who were newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. These participants, all of whom were obese and not yet on diabetes medication, were randomly assigned to either a very low-calorie ketogenic diet or a Mediterranean-type diet. By the midway point, only 10 participants remained, and eight completed the full trial. This small sample size highlighted the preliminary nature of the research, though its findings offered valuable insights.
Participants assigned to the keto diet were provided with protein-based meals containing less than 30 grams of carbohydrates per day. After two months, they were gradually transitioned to a Mediterranean diet to mitigate potential safety concerns associated with prolonged keto dieting. From the fourth month onward, both groups adhered strictly to the Mediterranean diet for the remainder of the study.
Researchers evaluated the participants’ progress through stool samples, anthropometric measurements such as BMI and waist circumference, and key metabolic markers, including hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) levels and triglycerides. These assessments provided a comprehensive view of how each diet influenced health outcomes.
Keto Diet’s Short-Term Advantages
Over the first six months, participants in the keto diet group demonstrated superior improvements in several critical health metrics compared to those following the Mediterranean diet. Notable findings included significant reductions in HbA1c levels, BMI, and waist circumference. Additionally, the keto diet promoted a healthier gut microbiome, with an increase in Akkermansia bacteria, which are linked to metabolic health and gut barrier protection.
“The initial benefits of the keto diet were encouraging, particularly in improving glycemic control and promoting weight loss,” noted Jason Ng, MD, BA, of the University of Pittsburgh’s Department of Medicine. Although he was not involved in the study, Dr. Ng emphasized the importance of these short-term improvements for individuals managing type 2 diabetes.
Despite these early successes, the study revealed that the keto diet’s advantages were not enduring. By the six-month mark, most of the improvements began to plateau or regress, although participants did not return to their baseline health metrics. Researchers suggested that this decline might be due to the reintroduction of carbohydrates and the transition to a Mediterranean diet.
Risks Associated with the Keto Diet
The keto diet’s restrictive nature has raised concerns among health experts. Dr. Ng highlighted potential risks, such as nutrient deficiencies, liver strain, kidney problems, and gastrointestinal issues. “Nutrient deficiencies can result from a lack of variety in vegetables and grains, while the high intake of fats and proteins can place excessive demands on the liver and kidneys,” he explained. Additionally, the diet’s low fiber content can lead to constipation, and the brain’s deprivation of glucose may cause mood swings and cognitive difficulties.
Michelle Routhenstein, MS, RD, CDCES, CDN, a preventive cardiology dietitian and founder of EntirelyNourished, also voiced her concerns. “In my practice, I frequently encounter patients who have tried the keto diet and experienced increased blood sugar levels, inflammation, elevated blood pressure, and worsening lipid profiles,” she said. These adverse effects underscore the importance of closely monitoring individuals who adopt the keto diet, particularly those with preexisting health conditions.
Mediterranean Diet: A Safer, Sustainable Alternative
In contrast to the keto diet, the Mediterranean diet emphasizes a balanced approach to nutrition and lifestyle. It includes a variety of whole foods, such as fruits, vegetables, whole grains, nuts, seeds, and olive oil, along with moderate consumption of fish, poultry, and dairy products. This diet is widely recognized for its cardiovascular benefits and overall sustainability.
“A Mediterranean diet is a valuable resource and tool to help people with type 2 diabetes control their sugars, improve weight loss, and maintain long-term health,” Dr. Ng asserted. Unlike the keto diet, which demands significant lifestyle changes and may be difficult to sustain, the Mediterranean diet offers a more practical and enjoyable way to manage diabetes and other metabolic conditions.
Routhenstein echoed this sentiment, recommending that individuals prioritize nutrient adequacy and effective meal planning over restrictive diets. “Rather than following fad diets, I advise focusing on a balanced approach that includes proper timing for meals. This strategy is more sustainable for managing type 2 diabetes and improving overall health,” she said.
Insights into Gut Microbiota
One intriguing aspect of the study was its examination of gut microbiota. Researchers observed that the keto diet’s initial impact on gut microbial diversity was significant, with notable increases in beneficial bacteria such as Akkermansia. These findings suggest that short-term adherence to the keto diet may positively influence gut health, potentially contributing to its early metabolic benefits.
However, as participants transitioned to the Mediterranean diet, these microbiota changes diminished. The study’s authors hypothesized that the reintroduction of carbohydrates and other dietary adjustments may have influenced gut microbial composition. Further research is needed to understand the long-term implications of these changes and how they interact with metabolic health.
Implications for Clinical Practice
The study’s findings have important implications for healthcare providers working with individuals who have type 2 diabetes. While the keto diet may offer rapid improvements in certain health metrics, its sustainability and safety remain concerns. Dr. Ng emphasized the importance of tailoring dietary interventions to individual needs, stating, “Potential weight loss and possible improvement in gut microbiota from keto diets may be beneficial for carefully selected patients who are otherwise healthy. However, close monitoring is essential to minimize side effects.”
For most individuals, the Mediterranean diet represents a safer and more practical option. Its emphasis on balanced nutrition and lifestyle changes aligns with established guidelines for managing diabetes and promoting overall health. “A Mediterranean diet is easier to maintain and has a proven track record of improving health outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes,” Dr. Ng noted.
Looking Ahead: The Future of Dietary Research
While this study provides valuable insights into the effects of keto and Mediterranean diets, its small sample size and short duration highlight the need for further research. Larger, long-term studies could help clarify the risks and benefits of these diets and identify strategies for optimizing their effectiveness.
“Understanding the nuances of how different diets affect metabolic health is crucial for developing personalized dietary recommendations,” Routhenstein said. As the field of nutrition science continues to evolve, healthcare providers will be better equipped to guide patients toward sustainable and effective dietary choices.
In the meantime, individuals with type 2 diabetes should consult with healthcare professionals before making significant dietary changes. A balanced, individualized approach remains the key to achieving lasting health improvements.